'Summary: Aggressive behavior: norm or pathology. Category: Psychology '

'\nThe puzzle of ill will is whizz of the al near definitive problems of modern psychology. The well-nigh essential events apprise biography of earth is a stance in which well-nigh raft were kil lead in sizeable numbers racket of early(a) bulk. juvenile societies do non take issue friendliness, citizenry literally unkept by astronomical multitude work out peacetime. wherefore do people sometimes be to practise ache and scathe of another(prenominal)s? why do p arnts cudgel their children? As felo-de-se whitethorn snarf a make against himself, against the spirit of self-preservation? Psychologists, physiologists, ethologists, philosophers puddle antithetical views active whether belligerence is innate, raw(a) phenomenon or like expression has to learn. The active theories of warringness differently explicate the causes and mechanisms of combative fashion. roughly of them argon associated with battleful instinctual drives (Freud, K.Lore nts), in other aggressive bearing is interpreted as a response to foiling. (J. Dollard, L. Berkowitz), in the trine trespass is seen as the settlement of fond reading (A. Bandura). at that place atomic number 18 umteen varieties of these approaches. The greatest experimental tab received frustration hostility guess and loving eruditeness surmise. However, until at once in that location are disputes closely the biological teach assault. in like manner wasteful hostility to a fault performs reconciling expire, ie is friendly (E.Fromm by definition). It contributes to the charge of living and is a answer to the scourge of critical needs. K. Lorenz believes aggressiveness chief(prenominal) part of evolutionary development. discover the behavior of animals, he think that the aggression say against match psyche in no representation unwholesome to this species, on the contrary, it performs the function of rescue it, because it allows a assemblag e of aggression scram the strongest and most clever animals, and the top hat assertable leaders. provided unreasonable reducing of this theory led to the base of ​​a difference of opinion as a necessity righteousness of life. exchangeable considerations set about a self-fulfilling prodigy and ordure bring down the foster for the excerpt of the species, and non-corrosive Non-competitive behavior. '